Congress has scheduled hearings with U.S. automakers later this month, with the planned focus being vehicle affordability. Automotive prices have surpassed record levels at a point when many Americans are struggling to pay bills. However industry leaders are reportedly trying to wiggle out of the event.
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX), pitched the hearings as Chairman of the U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. He previously expressed concerns that government mandates and environmental regulations were playing a major role in elevating U.S. vehicle prices — which presently hover around a record $50,000 average transaction.
With the presumed emphasis on deregulation, one would assume the automakers would be eager to address Congress. However, it was reported last month that Ford CEO Jim Farley was seeking to snub the hearing on the grounds that Elon Musk wouldn’t be there. Tesla was instead sending Lars Morvay, who serves as the company’s VP of engineering
From Politco:
In the Dec. 12 letter, Farley told Cruz through a lawyer that he has a scheduling conflict on the day of the hearing, Jan. 14. In addition, he said the proposed hearing was unfair to other auto executives because it invites “witnesses of different seniorities.”
The Commerce Committee announced in November that it had invited the CEOs of Ford, GM and Stellantis. But for Tesla, the announced witness was the company’s vice president of vehicle engineering.
“As previously discussed with your staff, Ford believes that it is essential that any potential hearing adhere to Congress’s longstanding tradition of ensuring comparable treatment for similarly situated companies,” wrote Brian Smith, a lawyer for Covington & Burling, which represents Ford. Smith added that “if a vice president of engineering is appropriate for the planned hearing, the other companies should have the opportunity to offer a similar witness.”
The Detroit News has since reported that General Motors is following suit. A GM spokesperson has confirmed that "CEO Mary Barra will attend the hearing if the other companies’ CEOs do the same." Meanwhile, there have been no official statements regarding Stellantis CEO Antonio Filosa.
It’s a similar story with the Japanese brands, which don’t appear to have been invited by Cruz in the first place. This is interesting because several Japanese automakers have massive manufacturing footprints inside the United States. Toyota also tends to lead in terms of U.S. sales most years, with Honda often jockeying for position with Ford and General Motors.
This emphasis on Elon Musk being (or not being) present for the hearings feels rather trivial when Congress doesn’t even seem interested in hearing from representatives of all brands. But this has remained the focus of both the industry and the media.
Cruz has stated that he opted against inviting the Tesla CEO because of concerns that would shift focus away from the core issues and toward his previous role in government — specifically the short lived Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) that now looks to have been disbanded by the Trump administration.
It’s not clear whether he’s afraid of what Musk might say about government policy or that the public response would revolve around Elon as a media personality. Perhaps both, as the latter item has already become a problem.
As far as the affordability hearings, which are scheduled to kick off on January 14th, automakers could use it as an opportunity to explain their position to the public while attempting to convince legislators to ease off on regulations. Cruz at least seems highly amenable toward deregulation and the Trump administration has shown similar proclivities.
Tariffs, despite not being the focus of the talks, could also come up — with automakers having previously expressed concerns on how they impact operating costs.
But it’s not abundantly clear that automakers actually want lower prices. While regulations have undoubtedly encouraged elevated MSRPs, companies have likewise been chasing higher margins on vehicles by offering fewer affordable models over the years. Many brands have been able to maintain steady profits despite lower annual volumes.
Financing is another topic automakers would probably like to avoid. Controlling debt and interest has become increasingly lucrative, with financing now comprising anywhere from 20 to 50 percent of dealership profits. While those entities aren't always linked to manufacturers, automakers absolutely have captive finance companies of their own.
Publicly discussing all that at a point where their customers are less-than pleased with the industry and its current products may not go over well. Meanwhile, few individuals in Congress have showcased any sound understanding of the auto industry and hearings often just devolve into long stints of lecturing to win brownie points with voters. The industry likely prefers to deal with the government via lobbying efforts whenever possible, particularly when the alternative could lead to public embarrassment.
[Images: Volodymyr TVERDOKHLIB/Shutterstock; Paper and Lens Co/Shutterstock]
Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.
via Autobuzz Today
Comments
Post a Comment